[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 2 (Summer 2022) ::
مدیریت پرستاری 2022, 11(2): 1-13 Back to browse issues page
Clinical decision making in Iranian nurses: systematic review
Tayebeh Moradi , Khadijeh Sharifi *
, sharifi81@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1733 Views)
Introduction: Clinical decision making is one of the most important processes which nurses always use to care for patients. Appropriate decisions help to improve the quality of care, reduce the duration of illness and disability, reduce costs and make optimal use of resources. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to review studies conducted in the field of clinical decision making of Iranian nurses and its related factors.
Methods: The present study was a systematic review conducted in 2021. In this research, articles published in databases of Magiran, Iran doc, SID, Science Direct, Pub med, Scopus, web of science, and Google Scholar in both Persian and English without any time limit were examined. For this purpose, the keywords “clinical decision making” and “nurse” in Persian sources and “clinical decision making”, “nurse”, “Iran” and their MeSH equivalents in English articles were applied using OR and AND operators. Conducting research in Iran was the most important inclusion criterion. Accordingly, out of a total of 144 articles related to clinical decision making of nurses in Iran, 49 ones remained after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and by eliminating duplicate cases, 21 articles were finally included in the study. STROBE tool was used to evaluate the quality of articles.
Results: Out of 144 initial articles, 21 studies were analyzed. The results of the analysis of 21 articles showed that nurses' participation in clinical decision making was moderate and their decision making was intuitive analytical. Nurses with older ages, more work experiences and employed formally and contractually had better clinical decision making. There was also a statistically significant positive association between clinical decision making and the variables of self-efficacy, the thinking style and emotional intelligence.
Conclusion: In order to improve the quality of nursing, health system officials should pay attention to the employment and arrangement of nurses, their type of decision making, state of emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and style of thinking. In addition, nursing managers should employ nurses with older ages, and more work experiences, as well as formally employed ones for wards and posts which require more and better clinical decision making
Keywords: clinical decision making, Nurse, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 276 kb]   (1156 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/04/10 | Accepted: 2022/08/8 | Published: 2022/08/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

moradi T, sharifi K. Clinical decision making in Iranian nurses: systematic review. مدیریت پرستاری 2022; 11 (2) :1-13
URL: http://ijnv.ir/article-1-928-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 2 (Summer 2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مدیریت پرستاری Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645