[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 4 (3-2016) ::
مدیریت پرستاری 2016, 4(4): 45-57 Back to browse issues page
Institutionalizing the educational role of nurses by Deming cycle (PDCA)
Mahdiyeh Arian , Hamed Mortazavi * , Mahbubeh TabatabaiChehr , Hassan Navipour , Zohreh Vanaki
Department of Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Gerontological Care Research Center, Bojnurd, Iran , hamedmortazavi@ymail.com
Abstract:   (13171 Views)

Background: The common patients' complaints is the educational role of nurses. So, the health system should be used appropriately and dynamic management model that is aligned with the clinical audit cycle for planning and institutionalizing the educational role of nurses.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to institutionalization the educational role of nurses by Deming management cycle (PDCA) based on the patients satisfaction.

Materials and Methods: This study was an action research that was done with collaboration between nursing school and two teaching hospitals in Bojnord in one year (2013-2014). At first problems' patient education was identified by (5Whys) technique and then planning for solving those problems based on PDCA started. Based on the PDCA for assessing used forms and tools (eg., patient satisfaction, barrier identification form, SMOG formula and  PEMAT). In implementation phase patient satisfaction from the training provided in 5 steps, barriers to patient education from nurses' and students' viewpoint in the 2 steps, patients' literacy levels in 500 patients before change and readability level of educational pamphlets before and after change according to the SMOG formula and PEMAT measured. The next step implemented changes based on past step identified problems and barriers. After change implemented, again patients satisfaction measured in five steps with (200) patients in each steps. Data were analyzed by SPSS 20 software and using statistical tests ANOVA and T-test.

Results:The most important barriers from the nurses' and nurse managers' viewpoint was lack of knowledge of the principles of patient education and from the students' viewpoint was high level of pamphlet' contents. The mean level of patients' literacy (n=500) was (6.72 ± 4.34). Readability level pamphlets had significant difference before and after modification based on the SMOG formula and PEMAT so, the paired t-test was significant (p <0.05). Average levels of patient satisfaction during the 5 stages were (10.33 ±2, 11.52±3.25, 14.11 ±4.41, 16.59 ±3.78, 16.94 ±4.1) that ANOVA test showed promotion ((p <0.05).

Conclusions: For changing in clinical education and learning, applying the Deming model suggest to nurse managers and educational managers in nursing, because it has direct effect on students' education and preparing them for adopting educational role in future. Also, clinical learning environments will be enrich that would be promoted faculty staff, clinical nurses competencies and the end improve patients satisfaction. 

Keywords: Deming model, SMOG formula, PDCA cycle, Patient Education
Full-Text [PDF 1189 kb]   (5680 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/04/11 | Accepted: 2016/01/2 | Published: 2016/01/12
References
1. Robinson M, Gilmartin J. Barriers to communication between health practitioners and service users who are not fluent in English .Nursing Education Today. 2002;22(6):457-65. [DOI:10.1054/nedt.2002.0758]
2. Bastable S. Essentials of patient education. Sudbury (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2008: 203.
3. Johansson K, Leino-Kilip H, Salantera S, Lehtikunnas T, Ahonen P, Elomaa L, et al. Need for change in patient education: A finnish survey from the patient's perspective. Patient Education&Counselling. 2003;51(3):239-45. [DOI:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00223-9]
4. American Hospital Association. A Patient's Bill of Rights: American Hospital Association catalogue no.2415. Chicago, IL: The Association; 1975.
5. Deccache A, van Ballekom K. From patient compliance to empowerment and consumer's choice: Evolution or regression? An overview of patient education in French speaking European countries. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010;78(3):2827. [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.012]
6. Zokaie Yazdi S, Mosayyeb Moradi J, Mehran A. Perspective of the nursing staff at hospitals affiliated to the Tehran University of Medical Sciences on the roles and activities of the nurses. Journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences2002;8(16):77-83.[Persian].
7. Rankin S, Stallings K. Patient education, principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
8. Beagley L. Educating patients: understanding barriers, learning styles, and teaching techniques. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2011;26(5):331-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2011.06.002]
9. Goupy F, Ruhlmann O, Paris O, Thelot B. Results of a comparative study of in-patient satisfaction in eight hospitals in the paris region. Quality Assurance of Health Care. 1991;3:309-15. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/3.4.309]
10. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? . Social Siences & Medicine. 1994;38:509–16. [DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-X]
11. Cooper H, Booth K, Fear S, Gill G. Chronic disease patient education: lessons from meta-analyses. Patient Education & Counselling. 2001;44:107-17. [DOI:10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00182-8]
12. Scott A, Smith R, Ktcsiitiauopss. Keeping the customer satisfied: issues in the interpretation and use of patient satisfaction surveys. International Journal of Quality of Health Care. 1994;6:353-359. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/6.4.353]
13. Bahrampour A, Zolala F. Patient satisfaction and related factors in Kerman hospitals. Eastern Mediterranaian Health Journal. 2005;11:905-12.
14. Lewis P, Cooke G. Developing a lean measurement system to enhance process improvement. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering. 2013;4(03):145-51. [DOI:10.1051/ijmqe/2013058]
15. Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle: Avaiable at : http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/project-planning-tools/ overview/pdca-cycle.html. Accessed January 2015.
16. Dindo D, Clavien P-A. Quality Assessment in Surgery: Mission Impossible? Patient Safety in Surgery: Springer; 2014.
17. Hewitt-Taylor J. Identifying, analysing and solving problems in practice. Nursing Standard. 2012;26(40):35-41. [DOI:10.7748/ns.26.40.35.s48]
18. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University All rights reserved Not for reproduction or redistribution without permission-2006
19. Rockville M. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and User's Guide:.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Avaiable at: http://wwwahrqgov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/self-mgmt/ pemat/pemat1html October 2013.
20. Redman B. . Measurement Tools in Patient Education. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Co.; 2003.
21. Ashghali- farahani M, Mohamadi E, Ahmadi Maleki M, Hajizadeh E. Obstacles of patient education in CCU and post CCU: a grounded theory study . Iran Journal of Nursing 2009;22(5):55-73. [Persian]
22. Aldridge M. Writing and designing readable patient education materials. Nephrological Nursing Journal. 2004;31(4):373-7.
23. Fazlollahi S, Maleki Tavana M. Methodology of content analysis techniques with emphasis on text readability assessment and determination of the coefficient of conflict. Reaserch. 2010;2(1):71-94. [Persian].
24. Vafai Najar A, Shaid Far M. Patient education services and the organizational factors affecting them.Journal of Health System. 2009;1(1):31- 40. [Persian].
25. Khezerloo S, Salehmoghaddam A, Mazloom S. Assessment of nurses professional roles in hospitals affiliated to mashhad university of medical sciences. Hakim .2013;15(4): 346- 51. [Persian].
26. Thompson R. Some practical applications of Deming's 14 points. Journal of Quality Assurance. 1990;12(4):22-3. 27. Williams T, Howe RW. Edwards Deming and total quality management: an interpretation for nursing practice. Journal of Health Care Quality. 1992;14(1):36-9.
27. Neuhauser D. The quality of medical care and the 14 points of Edward Deming. Health Matrix. 1988;6(2):7-10.
28. Gillem T. Deming's 14 points and hospital quality: responding to the consumer's demand for the best value health care. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance. 1988;2(3): 70-8.
29. Mohajer T. Fundamental of patient education. Tehran : Salemi, 2001.[Persian].
30. Margaret K, Barbara Leen N. [Basic of patient education]. Translated by Rakhshani F, Vanaki Z. 1st ed. Tehran: Kankash 1998:58-60. [Persian].
31. Aziznejad P, Zabihi A, Hosseini S, Bijani A. Nurses and Nurse Managers Opinions about the Patient's Training Barriers. Journal of Babol Uiversity of Medical Sciences. 2010;12(5):60-4. [Persian].
32. Sultani A, Hadavi M, Heydari S, Shahabinezhad M. Barriers to Patient Education Based on the Viewpoints of Nurses and Nurse Managers in Hospitals of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 2008. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;12(4):309-18. [Persian].
33. Mardanian L, Salahshorian A, Mohammad Alayha J, Hosseini F, . Nurses' perception of patient teaching, enhancing and inhibiting factors. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2005;17(40):18-27. [Persian].
34. Spadero DC. Assessing readability of patient information materials. Pediatric Nursing. 1983;9:274-8.
35. LaPierre G, Mallet L. Readability of materials. . Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal. 1987;120:718-28.
36. Doak C, Doak L, Root JH, 1985. TpwllsNYJBL. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. New York: J. B. Lippincott. 1985.
37. Mehdipour Rabari R, Jamshidi N, Soltaninejad A, Sabzevari S. The impact of nursing on the satisfaction of patients and patient education on knowledge, attitude and practice nurses in the cardiac intensive care unit. Journal of Health And Care 2011;13(1):30-6[Persian].
38. Heshmati -Nabavi F, Memarian R, Vanaki Z. The effect of implementing clinical supervision model on the patient education outcomes. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2012;1(3):28-36. [Persian].
39. Poroch D. The effect of preparatory patient education on the anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nursing. 1995;18(3):206-14. [DOI:10.1097/00002820-199506000-00005]
40. Cameron C. Practice education facilitators-from theory to practice. Journal of Community Nursing. 2006;20(4):18.
41. Ślusarska B, Zarzycka D, Wysokiński M, Sadurska A. Patient education in nursing—Polish literature condition. Patient education and counseling. 2004;53(1):31-40. [DOI:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00112-5]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arian M, Mortazavi H, TabatabaiChehr M, Navipour H, Vanaki Z. Institutionalizing the educational role of nurses by Deming cycle (PDCA) . مدیریت پرستاری 2016; 4 (4) :45-57
URL: http://ijnv.ir/article-1-307-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 4 (3-2016) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مدیریت پرستاری Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645