[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 1, Issue 3 (12-2012) ::
مدیریت پرستاری 2012, 1(3): 37-45 Back to browse issues page
Assessing quality of nursing documentations and effective factors on it in medical-surgical units
Madineh Jasemi * , Alireza Mohajal Aghdam , Azad Rahmani , Farahnaz Abdollahzadeh , Vahid Zamanzadeh
Nursing & Midwifery School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , jasemi_master@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (22664 Views)

Introduction: Nursing documentations are signs of nursing care implementation. Follow the principals of documentation could be effective for patients’ safety nurses’ security.

Aim: This study was done for Assessing quality of nursing documentations and effective factors on it in medical-surgical units.

Method: This study was descriptive- corollative that was done in 2010.All of nurses in medical and surgical units in teaching hospitals (170) were in this study and also, 2040 documents selected simple randomly which they were in four domain in nursing nursing record, check vital signs , intake & output and drugs administration. They were observed by checklist. Reliability was 88% by inter-rater observers. Nurses’ attitude, their knowledge and viewpoints about the quality of effective factors on nursing documentation were assessed by questioners. Reliability of knowledge questioner was 0.97% by using Kuder Richardson 21. Reliability of attitude questioner was 0.90% by using test –re test. Also, this test showed that reliability of questioner for assessing quality of effective factors was 0.91%. Validity all of the questionnaires was assessed by content validity. Data analyzed by Pearson test, One-way-ANOVA and T test by SPSS software.

Results: The results showed that 100% of nursing record and vital sign charts had average level of quality, 85.9% of drug administration and 81.2% of I&O of fluids domains had good level of quality. 85.1% of nurses had average level of  knowledge and 99.5% of  them had positive attitude toward nursing documents  and viewpoint of 78.4% nurses  about quality  of management’ factors were average level. There were significant relationships between kind of units, hospital and experience with quality of nursing’ documents (p<0.001 (gender and quality of nursing’ documents (p=0.003) and age with nursing’ documents (p=0.006).

Conclusion: It is recommended that hospitals improve necessary conditions for corporation, motivation, organizational communication, and education for nurses. In addition, it is recommended to nurses who are knowledge worker improve their individual skills and team-work capabilities to increase their competence and job satisfaction.

Keywords: nursing documents, medical-surgical nursing, quality of nursing documents
Full-Text [PDF 591 kb]   (2964 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2012/09/8 | Accepted: 2013/10/6 | Published: 2013/10/6
1. Parviz N. Recording and document in nursing. Gorgan: Faragei publisher.2002.[Persian]
2. Hanifi N, Mohammadi E. Causes of the lack of proper reporting of Nursing. Hayat.2004; 21(2): 39-49. [Persian]
3. Khaddam H, Sanagou A, Juibari L. Effect of education on the quality of nursing documents. Journal of Gorgan Bouyeh Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery. 2001; 8(10):65-70. [Persian]
4. Johnson M, Symes l, Bernard l, Landson MJ, Carroll TL.Mentoring disadvantaged nursing students' through technical writing workshops. Nurse Educator. 2007;32(4):168-172. [DOI:10.1097/01.NNE.0000281087.43088.f5]
5. Abbasi M.Writing and oral reporting in nursing. Tehran: Salemi publisher. 2000.[Persian]
6. Judit A, Schiling MC.Complete guide to documentation.Philadelphia:Lippincott Co, 2003.
7. Darmer MR, Ankersen L, Nielsen BG, Landberger G, Lippert E, Egerod I. The effect of a VIPS implementation program on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2004;18(3):325-32. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00289.x]
8. Cheevakasemsook A, Chapman Y, Francis K, Davies C. The study of nursing documentation complexities. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2006;12(6):366-374. [DOI:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00596.x]
9. Ahmadi F. Assessing quality of nursing records for patients hospitalized in selective hospitals in Tehran provenience. Proceeding Congress of the Law and Regulation in Nursing Profession; 1999 November 17-20; Tehran, Iran.[Persian]
10. Björvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I Experiences of using the VIPS-model for nursing documentation: a focus group study [corrected]. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;43(4):402–410. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02751.x]
11. Rangraz F, Farzandipor M, Moosavi G. Study of patients' information records in emergency wards in Kashan hospitals. Feyz. 2002;31(3):61-73. [Persian]
12. Baghaie T, Salehmoghadam A, Seiedi M. Survey of nurses' view point about knowledge and attitude of managers in management principles and its relationship with management performance. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2004;17(40):62-69. [Persian]
13. Mosavi A. Management principles in nursing. Tehran: Khosravi publisher. 2005.[Persian]
14. Ariyaei M. A Survey on the contents of medical records general hospitals affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences during the first three months of 1999. Journal of Health Administration. 2002; 4 (11):65-70.]Persian].
15. Hallajpure M.Comparison of quality of nursing records in general and surgical wards. [ MSc. thesis] Nursing. Tehran:Tarbiat Modarres University.1996. [Persian]
16. Bjoervell C, Wredling R, Thorell I. Long term increase in quality of nursing documentation:effects of a comprehensive intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2002;16(1):34-42. [DOI:10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00049.x]
17. Kim YJ, Park HA. Analysis of nursing records of cardiac-surgery patients based on the nursing process and focusing on nursing outcomes.International Journal of Medical Informatics.2005;74(11-12):952-959. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.004]
18. Allen D. Record-keeping and routine nursing practice: the view from the wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing.1998;27(6):1223-1230. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00645.x]
19. Uys LR, Minnaar A, Simpson B, Reid S. The effect of two models of supervision on selected outcomes. Journal of Nursing Scholarship.2005;37(3):282-288. [DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00048.x]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jasemi M, Mohajal Aghdam A, Rahmani A, Abdollahzadeh F, Zamanzadeh V. Assessing quality of nursing documentations and effective factors on it in medical-surgical units. مدیریت پرستاری 2012; 1 (3) :37-45
URL: http://ijnv.ir/article-1-97-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 3 (12-2012) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مدیریت پرستاری Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652